MS vs VMware. Who’s better at Disaster Recovery?

02Sep10

Anybody who is involved in running high availability services in a virtualised world ought to read through this very informative article.

It discusses the various techniques used to prioritise the restarting of services when failures occur on a particular host.

Firstly, there is confusion over whether the article is about true Disaster Recovery (DR) – by that I mean a geographically placed standby site should your primary datacentre suddenly be filled up with water. I can only conclude that the article is really referencing a local site as it talks about software lockstepping, partnerships with third parties etc – all these things are only really suitable for a geographically close site because they rely on very low latencies between the various systems.

So at this point let me introduce another idea:

“To avoid having to worry about any restart scenarios, deploy your critical hosts on fault tolerant technology …”



No Responses Yet to “MS vs VMware. Who’s better at Disaster Recovery?”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.